
|
Fisheries Theme Team
Aquaculture
Large-scale marine and Great Lakes aquaculture in the United
States dates back to stocking programs with cultured fishes and
invertebrates that were initiated soon after the U.S. Fish and Fisheries
Commission was established in 1871. Part of Spencer F. Bairds
incentive to lobby Congress for establishment of the Commission
was his recognition that many of the nations commercial fisheries
were in decline.
Within a few years of being appointed Commissioner, Baird established
hatcheries on the east and west coasts as well as on the Great Lakes.
Atlantic and Pacific salmon, shad, cod, walleye, lobsters, and various
other species were spawned, hatched and stocked. In some cases eggs
or larvae were shipped long distances, including across the country
by rail for subsequent stocking. As a result, billions of aquatic
animals were released in an effort to enhance existing fisheries
or create new ones. Most attempts failed because larval feeds had
not been developed for most of the species being cultured; thus,
the animals were often released as newly hatched larvae and the
survival rates are assumed to have been extremely low. Successful
introductions included striped bass in California, along with common
carp throughout the nation. Both carp and brown trout were introduced
to the U.S. from Europe and rainbow trout were translocated from
the western states to other regions having suitable water temperatures.
Millions of Atlantic salmon fry were stocked on the west coast as
were Pacific salmon on the east coast. No successful salmon introductions
occurred until the 1980s when chinook and coho salmon were successfully
introduced into the Great Lakes.
Enhancement efforts in marine waters, with the exception of salmonids,
were curtailed in the early years of the nineteenth century. In
the interim, particularly beginning in the 1960s, aquaculture technology
has advanced to the point that significant numbers of fish and invertebrate
species can now be successfully reared in hatcheries to sizes that
have a much better probability of survival than was the case previously.
Salmon ranching in Alaska and the planting of shellfish beds in
many coastal waters are clear indications that enhancement programs
can be effective. Apparent successes associated with enhancement
programs targeting striped bass on the Atlantic seaboard and red
drum in Texas provide additional evidence that enhancement deserves
further consideration as one among several methods associated with
attempts to recover depleted fish stocks.
Enhancement programs for marine and Great Lakes fishes and invertebrates
would require facilities to hold and spawn broodstock, hatch eggs,
and, in many cases, rear the larvae to sizes where the chances of
survival are good. The size and precise type of those facilities
would vary considerably depending upon the species to be produced
and the number of individuals required to meet stocking program
needs.
Any enhancement program in coastal or Great Lakes waters should
involve an intensive series of studies to determine, at a minimum,
the following:
- Ensure the maintenance of genetic diversity within cultured
populations,
- Obtain broodstock from the same area where offspring will
be stocked to avoid mixing genetically distinct stocks,
- Determine the carrying capacity of the environment for the
introduced species (this would include determining that sufficient
food resources exist for native and stocked organisms),
- Determine if stocked fish assume the same behavioral patterns
as wild fish (this would include determining if stocked and
wild fish interbreed),
- Determine the percentage of enhancement animals that recruit
to the fishery.
The overall goals of an enhancement program would be to ensure
that stocking is conducted in an environmentally sound manner. Programs
that involve the stocking of aquatic species in state or federal
waters should use only native species.
The Secretary of Commerce has announced a national policy on aquaculture
and funding in support of research to address that policy has been
appropriated beginning in the fiscal 2000 NOAA budget. An Aquaculture
Theme Team has been active and has developed a brochure that outlines
a research and outreach agenda for aquaculture. Included in that
brochure is a discussion of enhancement, thus, there should be close
interaction between any National Strategic Initiative that is developed
for Fisheries and the one developed by the Aquaculture Theme Team.
|